Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation: Harnessing Brain Plasticity for Stroke Recovery and Functional Improvement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36676/ssjmra.v1.i3.23Keywords:
neuroplasticity, stroke rehabilitation, motor recovery, sensory recovery, cognitive rehabilitationAbstract
This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current understanding of neuroplasticity and its application in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke remains a leading cause of disability worldwide, often resulting in motor, sensory, and cognitive impairments. Neuroplasticity, the brain's ability to reorganize and adapt in response to experience and injury, offers promising avenues for recovery. This review discusses key principles of neuroplasticity and explores various rehabilitation strategies aimed at harnessing its potential for stroke recovery. Topics covered include early intervention, task-specific training, intensity and repetition, constraint-induced movement therapy, multimodal approaches, environmental enrichment, and neurostimulation techniques. Additionally, the paper discusses emerging research directions and challenges in optimizing neuroplasticity-based rehabilitation approaches. Understanding the role of neuroplasticity in stroke recovery can inform the development of more effective rehabilitation interventions and improve outcomes for individuals affected by stroke.
References
Bikson, M., Grossman, P., Thomas, C., Zannou, A. L., Jiang, J., Adnan, T., ... & Woods, A. J. (2016). Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence based update 2016. Brain Stimulation, 9(5), 641-661.
Dr. Neelam Raipuria Mangla. (2020). Exploring the Role of Resilience in Overcoming Traumatic Experiences. International Journal for Research Publication and Seminar, 11(4), 227–233. Retrieved from https://jrps.shodhsagar.com/index.php/j/article/view/1221
Elsner, B., Kugler, J., Pohl, M., & Mehrholz, J. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving function and activities of daily living in patients after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11), CD009645.
Hallett, M. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain. Nature, 406(6792), 147-150.
Lefaucheur, J. P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., ... & Garcia-Larrea, L. (2014). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clinical Neurophysiology, 125(11), 2150-2206.
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. The Journal of Physiology, 527(3), 633-639.
O'Shea, J., Boudrias, M. H., Stagg, C. J., Bachtiar, V., Kischka, U., Blicher, J. U., ... & Johansen-Berg, H. (2014). Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke. NeuroImage, 85, 924-933.
O'Brien, A. T., Bertolucci, F., Torrealba-Acosta, G., Huerta, R., & Fregni, F. (2020). Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognitive function and functional ability in stroke survivors: A protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine, 99(16), e19889.
Singh, S. (2024). Neuroplasticity and Rehabilitation: Harnessing Brain Plasticity for Stroke Recovery and Functional Improvement. Universal Research Reports, 11(3), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.36676/urr.v11.i3.1287
Wu, D., Wang, J., Yuan, Y., & Zhang, M. (2013). Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on naming and cortical excitability in stroke patients with aphasia. Neuroscience Letters, 549, 151-156.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shodh Sagar Journal for Medical Research Advancement
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.